[QCLUG] Vitalization in Linux and networking tests

Noah Norris preludelinux@gmail.com
Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:24:51 -0500


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Thanks ^^
Reading about the networking options ( looks good too )
Hmm supports bridge host networking ( most be the same as vmware bridged
mode )
Supports an internal networking  ( for vm's )

I bet making the virtual network interface on the host and guest thats not
bridged should work the way i want it too

looking for network cards that appear on host and vm's that can shared (
only by the host and the vm's and routing would have to be done to share
between networks)  but are not bridged interfaces

Qemu and kvm support the same things (networking) it seems

On 10/28/07, Mark Overholser Jr <omnipotent13@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The guys on the Linux Action Show say good things about VirtualBox
> http://www.virtualbox.org/
> I don't know if the networking capabilities are as sophisticated as the
> ones in VMware since I haven't used it (VirtualBox) yet.
>
> Mark
>
> On 10/27/07, Jason Sweat <jason.sweat@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 10/27/07, Noah Norris <preludelinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I've used vmware-server under Linux allot. what other Linux
> > Vitalization
> > > software exists?
> >
> > You might look at Xen for native linux virtualization
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xen
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jason
> > http://blog.casey-sweat.us/
> > _______________________________________________
> > QCLUG mailing list
> > QCLUG@qclug.org
> > http://qclug.org/mailman/listinfo/qclug
> >
>
>

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://qclug.org/pipermail/qclug/attachments/ea950d73/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--